A justice suggests flouting democratic norms after taking part in a decades-long project to weaken democratic rights.
Justice Samuel Alito expressed interest in reconsidering a ruling issued by the Supreme Court over 20 years ago.
The Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause gives defendants in criminal cases the right to “be confronted with the witnesses ...
4hOpinion
The New Republic on MSNThe Supreme Court’s Illusory Consensus on Ghost GunsThe high court's 7-2 decision suggests broad agreement on a contentious issue. But if you read between the lines, there are ...
This should have been, and turned out to be, a no-brainer. Gun manufacturers can’t get around background checks, serial ...
3don MSN
Justice Samuel Alito issued a detailed statement encouraging the Court to reconsider what exactly the Constitution's ...
The administration had tightened regulations on kits that can be easily assembled into nearly untraceable firearms.
Jon Bernstein, who co-leads the EdLiNC Coalition with Noelle Ellerson Ng, shares his insights on the arguments made in the E-Rate case before the U.S. Supreme Court this week.
Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote separately, respecting the denial of certiorari but urging the court to ...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday kept a Biden administration regulation on so-called ghost guns which allowed people to ...
You can get in touch with Jenna by emailing [email protected]. Languages: English. Justice Samuel Alito expressed interest in reconsidering a ruling issued by the Supreme Court over 20 years ago.
On Monday, the Court denied cert in Franklin v. New York, a Confrontation Clause case. Justices Alito and Gorsuch wrote statements regarding the denial of certiorari. Alito's statement calls into ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results