Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, saying that the precedent deserved a fresh look since the court ...
The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic buffer zone laws, earning a fiery dissent from Justice Thomas.
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have taken the cases. Start the day smarter. Get all the news you ...
Abortion opponents say laws limiting anti-abortion demonstrations near clinics violate their First Amendment rights. The high court turned down the appeals in orders handed down Monday.
The two cases questioned a longstanding precedent that upheld such laws, which opponents say violate free speech rights.
Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the court’s refusal to reconsider a 25-year-old precedent upholding “buffer zones” ...
The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a challenge to the legality of buffer zones used to protect access to ...
The cities argued that the restrictions were enacted to curb disturbing behavior from protesters outside health care facilities.
Kristan Hawkins, the head of the influential anti-abortion group Students for Life, told her 85,000 followers on X that a ...
The Supreme Court opted against hearing arguments in a pair of appeals Monday seeking to wipe out protest buffer zones around ...
The US Supreme Court dealt a setback to abortion opponents, refusing to reconsider a 2000 decision that lets states and cities create protective zones to shield patients from being approached near ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results